Federal Judge Bruce Reinhardt has given Donald Trump’s lawyers until 3 p.m. on Friday, Aug. 12, to file whether they object to the unsealing of warrants for the FBI’s search of Mar-a-Lago on Monday, Aug. 8. Former US President in Florida. A few minutes before the appointed time, elements of the decree began to filter through the press, shocking a country accustomed to surprises about Donald Trump. According to a document released by the Ministry of Justice on 45e The President of the United States is being investigated for possible violations of the Espionage Act of 1917.
FBI agents who went to his home on August 12 seized about twenty boxes of documents, many of them innocuous: photographs, letters tracing the history of the Trump presidency, which must be replicated by the archives. A “Property Receipt”, published at the same time as the search warrant, lists the recovered documents. Most are identified under vague headings: “Leather Shirt”, “Photographs”… two are a little more specific. The 2016 July 2020 executive order related to Donald Trump’s friend Roger Stone, who was sentenced to three years in prison as part of an investigation into suspected collusion between the Republican billionaire’s campaign team and Russia. , Other States in 2016: « Information Re: President of France » (“Information on the French President”, without further details). Elysee declined to comment.
High level classification
But investigators mostly found eleven sets up (the “SET”) classified documents whose presence at Mar-a-Lago could endanger national security. Many are classified at the highest level: TS/SCI (for highly classified/sensitive information). They can only be viewed in secure offices owned by the federal government, and a secret clearance is not enough. To read it, you must have special access and a specific reason.
The search warrant, dated Aug. 5 — three days before the move — cited legal documents investigators relied on to justify Mr. Trump’s call to the judge. “The Raid” in his apartment. The Espionage Act has surprised experts. It prohibits the collection of national security information that could harm the United States or aid foreign adversaries.
In this article you should read 64.77%. The following is for subscribers only.
“Web aficionado. Lifelong music lover. Pop culture guru. Professional tv expert. Wannabe beer scholar. Hipster-friendly coffee nerd.”